The D.C. government may not be sure the pain of Kristin

Maryland

Colorado has the nation’s most meticulously regulated medical
marijuana industry. Washington has the first-ever blood-level standard
for driving while high.

But in the birthplace of America’s medical
cannabis movement and home of the most robust pot economy, California
lawmakers can’t seem to figure out what they want to do about marijuana.

The
governance of marijuana in California remains hazy as many legislators
are skittish over California’s medical cannabis industry, over an
unfolding federal crackdown and over risking disapproval of law enforcement interests.

An Assembly committee last week advanced a bill to have the state
agency that regulates bars and liquor stores oversee medical cannabis
dispensaries.

The bill’s author argued that state regulation could
discourage ongoing federal raids on California marijuana businesses.
But law enforcement hates the proposal, and marijuana advocates are
divided.

A cop-driven bill in the Senate faces furious resistance
from cannabis advocates who complain that it will criminalize sick
people relying on marijuana. The bill would punish drivers for any
detectable level of nonprescription drugs, including marijuana.

Though
voters made California the first state to legalize marijuana for
medical use by passing Proposition 215 in 1996, California lags behind
in setting the rules.

"Proposition 215 called for the Legislature
to come up with regulations and they never have," said Sacramento lawyer
George Mull, whose California Cannabis Industry Association last year
pushed for a licensing bill for marijuana businesses and is trying again
this year.

State Senate leader Darrell Steinberg said it may take
two years for the Legislature to agree on how

While San Diego city leaders work on balanced
regulation providing access while protecting neighborhoods, federal
agents raided a downtown collective.

The move was described as intimidation by the city

A new bill to regulate California’s $1.3 billion medical marijuana industry cleared its first hurdle yesterday: the Assembly’s public safety committee.

Assemblymember Tom Ammiano‘s AB 473
would license everyone in the commercial medical marijuana supply chain

Dozens of medical marijuana activists rallied outside Los Angeles City Hall last week, declaring war on an enemy.

Their target was not the federal government, whose agents raided
several local dispensaries in recent days, or neighborhood groups trying
to shut down the city’s estimated 700 pot shops.

The enemy was fellow medical marijuana advocates.

Three competing measures on the May 21 city ballot have divided
L.A.’s lucrative medical cannabis industry, with each side accusing the
other of trying only to protect profits, not do what is best for
patients.

The measures may appear similar to the uninitiated, but they would greatly benefit different groups of pot businesses.

Yami Bolanos, who runs PureLife Alternative Wellness Center, is
backing Proposition D, which would shrink the number of pot shops to
about 130. Only dispensaries like Bolanos’, which opened before the
adoption of a failed 2007 city moratorium on new shops, would be allowed
to continue operating.

At the City Hall rally and news conference, Bolanos accused some
newer shops of catering to drug dealers by not requiring doctor’s
prescriptions and selling more than 8 ounces of marijuana per visit to
customers, more than twice what her store allows.

"Who needs 8 ounces, unless you’re going to break it up into dime bags and sell it in the street?" she said.

Proposition D is backed by the Los Angeles County Democratic Club and
by a labor union that has organized workers at dozens of older
dispensaries. The measure was placed on the ballot by the City Council
to counter two measures that qualified through the initiative process.

One of those initiatives, Measure F, would place no limit on the
number of pot shops but would require them to submit to city audits,
test cannabis for toxins and keep a certain distance from schools, parks
and other dispensaries. It is being pushed by a coalition of shops that
opened after the 2007 moratorium. Like Proposition D, it would increase
taxes on pot sales.

A third measure, Initiative Ordinance E, would permit only the older
shops but would not raise taxes. It was put on the ballot by a group of
older shops and the dispensary employees union, but that coalition has
shifted its support to the council-backed Proposition D.

The measure with the most votes will win, but only if it receives
more than 50% of the vote. If none of the three receives majority
approval, they all fail.

With the election a month away, the competing camps are collecting
campaign cash and stepping up attacks. An anti-Proposition D website
warns that the initiative would create a monopoly for older shops and
the rise of "pot superstores." By forcing existing dispensaries to
close, "Proposition D encourages building massive marijuana drug centers
that could greatly increase crime for nearby residents," the site says.

Grace Moore, who opened Grace Medical Marijuana Pharmacy in 2009,
said she is fighting Proposition D because market forces should
determine the number of dispensaries, not government. "The good will
succeed, and the places that are not so nice, people will not frequent,"
she said.

At her Pico Boulevard shop, customers are offered strains of pot like
Purple Cush and Blue Dream, as well as "Yes on Measure F" wristbands.

Moore has been growing marijuana for decades. As a single mother
living in West Virginia, she said she used to trade her pot for hay. Her
business has been successful, she says, because she grows cannabis
without pesticides and offers a safe environment for patients. "We are
an option for women and for truly ill people," she said.

But critics say the free-market model hasn’t worked, pointing to
heavy concentrations of pot shops in some parts of the city, including a
stretch of Mid-City known as the "Green Mile."

Michael Larsen, a member of the Eagle Rock Neighborhood Council,
fought to curb the glut of dispensaries in his community. He opposes all
the pot measures. Measure F allows too many stores, he said, and the
council-backed Proposition D doesn’t ensure the safety of dispensaries
or provide a mechanism for neighbors to complain about bad operators.

L.A. has struggled for years to regulate the location of pot shops
against a backdrop of contradictory court rulings on cities’ legal
authority to regulate pot. The city is battling more than 60 lawsuits
over its earlier attempts at regulation, and many predict new lawsuits
are inevitable after the May election.

"Whoever views themselves as the loser will immediately start
litigating," said former LAPD chief and current Councilman Bernard
Parks. He wrote the ballot measure arguments against all three
initiatives, arguing that federal law prohibits the possession and sale
of marijuana even if state law allows it for medicinal use.

"You can’t regulate an illegal business," he said.

On those grounds, the City Council last year voted 14 to 0 to outlaw
over-the-counter sales of marijuana, while allowing small groups of
patients to grow the drug for their own use. But it reversed the action
after the coalition of older dispensaries and union workers qualified a
measure for the ballot that would have repealed the ban.

Attorney David Welch, who is backing Measure F, said the council has
been hostile toward medical marijuana and voters should reject the
city-backed ballot proposal. He cited a council vote last August that
instructed police to work with the federal Drug Enforcement Agency "to
deal with medical marijuana collectives."

The next month, federal agents raided several pot shops in downtown
and Eagle Rock, an area represented by Councilman Jose Huizar, a leading
dispensary opponent. The council’s Proposition D is "a Trojan horse" intended to confuse and overwhelm voters, Welch said. "They want these measures to fail."

Huizar, Parks and other council members are urging voters to reject
all three measures. But several elected officials are backing
Proposition D, including council members Bill Rosendahl and Paul Koretz
and mayoral candidates Wendy Greuel and Eric Garcetti. It is also
endorsed by City Atty. Carmen Trutanich, who in the past argued that all
for-profit pot sales are illegal.

California voters have generally supported medical marijuana. In
1996, California became the first state to legalize medicinal use of
pot, although many have complained that subsequent state laws failed to
clarify how the drug should be distributed. In 2011, Los Angeles voters
approved a ballot measure to tax medical marijuana sales.

There are no official estimates of medical pot sales in the city, but
police believe there are between 600 and 700 shops, and dispensary
owners say sales of $1 million annually are not uncommon.

Don Duncan, California director of the medical marijuana advocacy
group Americans for Safe Access, said it is unfortunate that pot
supporters are being forced to choose sides. But the ballot measure
fight doesn’t reflect a larger schism in the medical marijuana movement,
he said.

"We’re not talking about a community division, we’re talking about an industry division."

His group has endorsed Proposition D. But he hopes the infighting
doesn’t doom all the measures. "We certainly cannot afford for everybody
to lose," he said.

He might direct the largest medical marijuana dispensary in the
country, but Steve DeAngelo isn

Today, the City of San Diego published Mayor Filner’s proposal for
medical cannabis regulation in the City of San Diego.  The proposal is
based on the recommendations of the medical marijuana taskforce,
organized by City Council President Todd Gloria in 2010.

It allows medical cannabis dispensaries to exist in designated
commercial and industrial areas of the city with large buffers from
sensitive areas, including a 600 foot buffer from schools and parks and a
1,000 foot buffer between dispensaries.  The proposal also contains
additional strict operating requirements including security systems,
restriction on hours of operations and signage.  

"We want there to be access in San Diego City," stated Ken Cole, a
cancer patient and president of the United Patients