The Chico News & Review, 24 Jan 2013 – Activists From Both Sides Unite to Draft New County Medi-Pot Ordinance Last August, after District Attorney Mike Ramsey declared the Butte County Board of Supervisors’ second attempt at a medical-marijuana ordinance unconstitutional, a novel idea was proposed: form an ad-hoc committee with representatives from both sides to draft a middle-ground mandate.
US CA: Wahl Of Defiance
The Chico News & Review, 09 Aug 2012 – Can New, Tougher Medi-Pot Ordinance Stand Up to Legal Challenge? A Chico lawyer and medical-marijuana advocate contends the new medi-pot ordinance under consideration by the Butte County Board of Supervisors is illegal and a slap in the face to voters who recently rejected a less-restrictive ordinance.
US MT: Court Debates Right To Sell Cannabis
Helena Independent Record, 31 May 2012 – Montana Supreme Court justices on Wednesday wrestled with the legal issue of whether people have a fundamental, constitutional right to sell medical marijuana, which is legal under state law, but illegal under federal law. A state attorney urged the Supreme Court to reverse a lower-court ruling that struck down part of the law, passed by the 2011 Legislature, that in essence banned the commercial sales of medical marijuana.
US MT: Montana Supreme Court Reviews Right to Sell Medical
Missoulian, 31 May 2012 – HELENA Montana Supreme Court justices on Wednesday wrestled with the legal issue of whether people have a fundamental, constitutional right to sell medical marijuana, which is legal under state law, but illegal under federal law. A state attorney urged the Supreme Court to reverse a lower-court ruling that struck down part of the law, passed by the 2011 Legislature, that in essence banned the commercial sales of medical marijuana.
US MT: Supreme Court To Hear Medical Marijuana Appeals This
The Billings Gazette, 28 May 2012 – HELENA – The Montana Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Wednesday on separate appeals filed by a medical marijuana industry group and the state of Montana. They are appealing separate portions of a 2011 District Court decision that temporarily blocked parts of a much stricter 2011 state law from being implemented.





